Instagram/@eizagonzalez
Eiza Gonzalez’s striking appearance at the ultra-glamorous Vogue World gala not only grabbed attention but also ignited debates since she paraded herself in the fabulous designer Mugler outfit which was certainly one of her followers’ favorites straight off the bat. The Mexican actress, while sharing her look, opted for a little thank-you note to the fashion designers but it was the specific details of her outfit that created lots of talk around her.
Advertisement
The actress was so gorgeous in the dress of Mugler that she called it a “work of art” coming from the designers Miguel Castro Freitas and the legendary Mugler official house, who was also blessed with David Yurman jewelry. With this involvement in the lavish fashion event, she was not only the cloth but also the person who emerged as the master of the avant-garde look by many and her flawless execution of the style was pointed at.
The moment there were many comments, one of the fans referred to her as “the top of Mexico” while another one simply stated she was “gorgeous… iconic as always.” The excitement was definitely coming from the high number of comments giving tribute to her beauty and also her appearance at the exclusive event. One most creative fan fancied the very unlucky “whoever was the french fry!” backstage in the cooker, which added even more to the fun interaction around her post.
On the other hand, the reactions were not all in her favor and one specific detail of her outfit turned out to be a surprisingly controversial topic. A user by the name Cynthia praised the outfit but tagged it with ‘the bra straps take away from the elegance. Cut those things off!’ She joined the discussion this way, first stating that she loved the look and calling it gorgeous but then, referring to the straps, saying they should be cut off, thus sparking a mini-debate about the pros and cons of the fashion choice and the styling that was going on in one of the replies.
The disagreement over the bra straps got more intense and quicker with one saying “this might be a mistake or wardrobe malfunction” but later deciding it was an intentional design component saying “They look BAD!!!” while another suggested the stylist “should’ve known better.” Such tiny details have been pointed out that even small things can become main characters in high-fashion moments when they are debated like this.
A different and slanderous view surfaced in the defense of the designer choice by stating that the straps did “make it more unique” and then going so far as to say that “we should practice giving more positive comments and keeping negative opinions to ourselves.” This back-and-forth showed the fashionable subjective nature and how sharply personal taste can differ among the viewers.
Amidst the fashion critique, many comments glorified Gonzalez’s Mexican roots and global charm. “Hay algo que esta morra no haga bien??” one fan commented, which roughly translates to “Is there anything that girl does not do well??” followed by loud Mexico cheers. Another admirer addressed her in various languages saying “Bella bellisima dans toutes les langues et for ever” – beautiful in all languages forever.
The variety of the reactions spanned beyond languages as one Russian-speaking fan was comparing her beauty to music, writing “Sounds that speak for themselves. That’s my music”. The poetic nature was the declaration of how Gonzalez’s beauty, like the world’s diverse peoples, has no cultural and language limits.
Religious affiliations also popped up in the comments when one user posted Hail Mary in Spanish perhaps indicating the almost sacred reverence some might have for the actress. The diversity of responses – from fashion critique to spiritual devotion – proves that the public appearances of stars like Gonzalez still manage to draw a large audience who engage in discussions that vary greatly and cover a wide range of topics.
Advertisement
The debate about
